A Brief History of Pharmacology as a Field
The earliest known written prescriptions are
both found on a Sumerian cuneiform clay tablet dating back
to 3,000 BC. But 2,000 years before that unknown doctor
wrote these two prescriptions for an unknown ailment, there
is archeological evidence of drug administration. [Time-Life
Drugs pp. 10] Long before doctors wrote prescriptions,
there were male and female shamans mixing up herbal remedies
for their tribe.
The greatest advantage humans have over the
animal kingdom is our ability to investigate, invent and
adapt new practices based on our research. We learned to
collect water in pots, create and wear clothes, grow crops
and irrigate them. We also learned to eat small amount of
sometimes poisonous substances to relieve our symptoms.
The earliest drugs were most likely leaves
plucked fresh and eaten on the spot. Later, the first
herbalist collected these leaves, dried and preserved them.
She experimented with dosages and solvents, and as she aged
to preserve this knowledge, she began training her sons and
daughters by moving about the forest touching and explaining
each plant.
One anthropologist following modern day
primitive tribesmen in New Guinea has discovered that the
average hunter-gather knows as many as 175 different plants
in his environment. He knows the foods, the poisons and the
medical herbs in his world. Furthermore, when
anthropologists who research food production compare notes,
they discover that in every part of the world, all
early humans had exploited their particular environment to
its fullest. Every grain that was capable of development as
a food crop in that location was developed, every animal
that could be tamed was domesticated and every herb with any
medical use was explored. Europeans, Africans and Asians
domesticated horses and cattle because they were in their
environment. Meso-Americans
created corn with genetic manipulation because the
undomesticated corn plant was found in their environment. (Guns,
Germs and Steel)
As humans collected into towns and then into
cities, pharmacology and other sciences had to became more
formal. Writing had to be invented to preserve knowledge and
to circulate better. Formal schools were set up all over the
ancient world.
Sources of Drugs
While a lot of early drugs derived from
plants, other came from minerals and animal sources; still
others from human tissue. In this current age, some of our
newest drugs are artificial molecules that have never
existed in nature. Newer drugs will be developed in outer
space, because some substances cannot be created in the
presence of gravity.
Social Limitations on Pharmacology
As humans developed from tribes into states
and empires, formal education became solidified as religion
and custom constricted exploration. Some of this
constriction, such as application of the 10 Commandments
from the Judeo-Christian religions or the Greek
philosophers’ Hippocratic Oath, created a moral base that
modern medicine needed.
But other constricts created serious
limitations to tech0logical advances. While everyone is
familiar with the Catholic Church’s sometimes baleful
influence on science in Europe, we are less familiar with
the education limitations placed by tradition-bound
Confucian scholars that hampered education in the East in an
identical manner, and in one case, the complete eradiation
of all written material in China published before a certain
date by the same despotic emperor who built the Wall of
China.
We are also less familiar with the
limitations placed by autocratic social system on progress--
such as those that limited the great medical school of
London which dominated 17th and 18th
century medical science. The ‘best physicians’ in the
British empire were trained in the excusive London school of
medicine. These were the society physicians who demanded
great salaries from great patrons. They moved about the
drawing rooms and palaces as equals to the autocrats they
treated. Highly respected gentleman from good families, they
went to the right parties, and to the right church.
In fact, this school was so exclusive that
the more humble men who could not train in London had to
make-d0 in faraway Glasgow, Scotland, a school that accepted
men of other religions and classes. Time and time again, we
discover that many of the great medical advances made in
1700s and 1800s in the British Empire happened at Glasgow--
not London. It is no surprise that American democracy
spurred technical advances in the last century.
The apothecary or
pharmacist industry didn’t help either. In an effort to
control their trade, they deliberately limited the
dissemination of drug knowledge. Not only ingredients, but
ratios, solvents and measurements were kept from the
competition by the creation of elaborate ciphers that rival
the De Vinci Code for complexity. These hand-written books
called pharmacopeias
or formulary
[recipe books] were closely guarded trade secrets
written in Greek, Latin or even made-up words. Therefore, it
is not surprising that apothecary measurements seem so
illogical.
For
example: the symbol for “Drops” is “gtts.”
Drug development has traditionally followed
the money trail. Paradoxically, this need for profit can
trigger technology, but it can also hamper technology that
is not cost effective.
For
example: community-acquired pneumonias are caused by
infections that affect everyone, so there is more research
and development of antibiotics for these disorders than for
some rare opportunist infections. Drugs for rare diseases
affecting small numbers of persons need special funding to
be studied.
In recent
years, federal funding for these ‘orphan drugs’ had to
increase to allow drug development for rare disorders.
Technical Limitations on Pharmacology
The Roman Empire absorbed not only territory,
but technology. The advances made by the Egyptians and the
Greeks included medicine and surgical knowledge and this
information was dispersed through out the empire [Europe and
Middle East] by written accounts. But most of this
knowledge was lost when the Roman Empire fell. The few
written accounts saved by Christian monks in distant places
like Ireland were stored for centuries in monastery
libraries. Unfortunately, this ancient knowledge was spotty
and incomplete, but it was treasured. In the minds of the
survivors of this lost age of greatness, the few classical
tests that survived became sacred tests that could not be
questioned. This attitude of reverence hampered the growth
of pharmacology.
In the beginning, drugs were simply crushed
leaves or powered seeds but even a single leaf of tobacco
contains more chemicals than nicotine. The major problem
with early medicine was that the herbalist more often than
not administrates more than one substance in his concoction.
The active
ingredient
is the substance that actually interacts with the cells to
create the action that is desired. This desired action is
called the primary
effect.
Other substances in an herb or mineral may or may not add to
the primary effect. Any affects that are not intended are
called side
effects.
Some side effects are helpful, others harmful.
Adverse
side
effects
are side effects that are detrimental-- even dangerous. Any
drug whose adverse side effects outweigh its primary
effect may not be safe enough to use. The problem with
crushed leaves is that the amount of the active ingredient
varies from plant to plant and from one growing season to
another. This was technical
hurdle to be overcome.
A Brief History of Drug Legislature in the
USA
After the Crusades introduced sophisticated
Arab drug technology into the Europe of the 12th
century the apothecary
[pharmacist] as a separate profession was created. These
Middle Eastern innovations included drug distillation,
fermentation and improved storage of liquids in non-porous
porcelain containers.
During the Middle
Ages, the physician would meet his patient at the
apothecary’s shop and the two would fine-tune a drug for
their patient. People who could not afford a physician would
bypass the middle man by dropping by the apothecary shop
where he could be diagnosed and treated by the apothecary. [Time-Life
Drugs pp. 16-21] Peasants, who could not afford the
apothecary, would drop by the local witch [female herbalist]
who would mix up an herbal concoction.
One of the goals of pharmacological research
is the development of drugs with more specialized primary
effects and to decrease—even to eliminate side effects. It
took centuries for chemistry to develop the tools to break
down, synthesize and concentrate active ingredients. Poppy
juice was used for centuries to relieve pain, but it was not
until 1806 that a German apothecary isolated opium thus
opening the flood gates for the creation of morphine and
heroin.
The scientific methods introduced in the age
of Enlightenment changed the world and a new era of sharing
information within the scientific community arose. In the
1880’s schools of medicine began to collect ‘recipes’ and
print their own pharmacopeias. With increased knowledge of
chemistry, some of these pharmacopeias were clearly better
than others and they became popular with doctors everywhere
in Canada and the USA.
By the 1800s, pharmacology and medicine in
general had become truly dangerous as more concentrated
drugs became patented and sold in pharmacies all over Europe
and the United States. Drug manufacturing became big
business as it moved out of the doctor’s office and into the
factories.
There was little or no regulation on patent
medicines and by 1900, the situation became critical. When
selling drugs to the public, a manufacturer learns quickly
that people want a drug that makes them feel better and feel
better quick. Nothing made folks ‘feel better quicker’ than
alcohol and opium based medicines, so most patent medicine
contained one or the other or both of these sedatives.
Click here to go to an example of pre-1914
pharmacopoeia belonging to a Waco, Texas vet
A druggist could mix up root beer with
morphine and alcohol, stick in a sprig of marijuana and call
the drink a "cancer cure." He would sell it directly to the
public under that label. The country was full of opium
addicts and alcoholics who did not even know they were
addicted because they did not know what was in their
medicines.
The Patent Medicine Menace
In mid-1800s, the temperance movement began
to lobby Congress against alcohol but the same well-meaning
men and women behind this movement were, sometimes,
unknowingly addicted to alcohol or worse substances found in
their patent medicine, even those prescribed by their
physician.
The druggist had no restraints on his rights
to mix and sell drugs. There were no laws regarding labeling
drugs. No one really knew what was inside his bottle of
Pratt’s Healing Ointment or Kennedy’s Medical
Discovery. No one knew that that the most popular
patent medicines for TB and other pulmonary problems were
merely cherry-flavored opium that depressed the cough-- but
did nothing for the infection.
The situation became critical and in May of
1905, a series of inflammatory articles in Collier’s
Magazine exposed both the food and drug industries as
heartless death machines existing only to make money. The
country was outraged and by 1906, Congress passed the
Pure Food and Drug Act in which any drugs that
contained opium or alcohol had to be labeled as such so that
consumers could choice to buy these addictive drugs. The law
did not discuss the safety or effectiveness of drugs being
sold.
Once the truth was out and the public was
better informed, companies like Coca-Cola TM had
to remove the cocaine from their products to keep sells up.
Some companies removed the additive drugs or converted their
patent medicine like Dr. Mile’s Compound into food
condiments [catsup] to stay in business.
In 1912 the Shirley Amendment
prohibited fraudulent claims regarding therapeutic results.
In 1914, after the well-publicized death of a
popular movie star from heroin overdose, the
Harrison Narcotics Act was passed to control
opium-derived drugs.
In 1938, after 100 people died from a new
sulfa drug dissolved in diethylene glycol, [antifreeze,]
Congress created the
Food and Drug Administration [FDA] to over-see their
demands that new drugs get toxicity testing before
marketing.
This act established the power of the FDA:
-
to approve all drugs for
safety if used in accordance with the manufactures’
guide lines. The FDA had the power to withdraw approval and
prevent marketing if this was not done.
-
Labeling rules became even stricter.
-
the US Pharmacopeias [USP] & the
National Formulary [NF] were accepted as the official
standards. For example, if your drug contained “oxygen” the
molecule had to be 02---not 0, or C02, or N20 but only 02.
Albuterol USP means that the drug contains the molecules in
the specific configuration as stated by the official recipe
books the USP and the NF.
Go here for example of a company’s packet
insert
Albuterol Insert
At this time, the drug company still
didn’t have to prove the drug was effective-- only safe.
Finally, in 1962, the
Harris-Kefauver Amendment added efficacy to the FDA
mandates. Now the pharmacological firms had to prove their
drug was safe and effective before it could be marketed.
Every 5 years, the FDA reviews the new
research and if a drug fails to prove effective for its
stated indication, the FDA can order the manufacture to
update its product information, or the FDA can even remove
the drug from the market. Note,
the FDA will not pull an older drug off the market if a
newer drug is better, only if the older drug is not
effective.
By 1952, the
Durham-Humphrey Act listed the drugs that required a
prescription to be sold by pharmacies, and by 1971, the
Controlled Substance Acts were passed to control
manufacturing and distribution of narcotics and other
dangerous drugs. This act also defined scheduled drugs.
While the FDA is completely involved with
drug development, its control over devices is spotty. In the
last few years, the FDA has gotten a little more involved
with the manufacture and sell of medical devices. Unsafe
devices must be reported to the manufacturer in writing and
if death occurred, the FDA must also be notified.
THIS MEANS YOU
All persons who are qualified
to operate this equipment are REQUIRED BY LAW to report
equipment malfunction (when used as directed) resulting in
injury, to the manufacture, who in turn is required to keep
ALL complaints on file for annual review by the FDA. A
health care professional is required to report deaths
related to equipment malfunctions directly to the FDA.
FDA FAQ's
Equipment Malfunctions
Example of a Respiratory Care Recall
Naming Drugs
A drug is a molecule which gains a
chemical name
based on its configuration. If the drug company that
extracted or created the molecules wants to research it, the
FDA gives the drug a code name,
a combination of numbers and letters. This drug may
now be studied only in animals for safety and possible
clinical uses.
During this
pre-clinical trial, the drug is studied for its
pharmacokinetic [see pharmacokinetic below.] After about 5
years of animal research, the FDA assesses the data
collected by the researchers. If the drug is still
considered safe and potentially effective, the FDA gives the
drug its generic name
and the research now moves into the 3 phases of
clinical trial by which the drug’s dose, frequency,
actual uses and safety are assessed first in healthy
volunteers and then in sick patients.
Once the drug successfully passes these 3
research steps, the FDA lets the company use the
trade name and market
the drug. During these first few years, the FDA continues to
monitor the drug’s safety during the Post-marketing
Surveillance phase. At this point, because thousands of
persons are now taking the drug, interactions with other
drugs or food can now become evident. Serious hazards may
come to light that weren’t evident during the more limited
clinical trials.
Labeling Drugs
All bottles of prescription drugs contain a
packet insert.
These inserts are written by the drug company under the
supervision of the FDA as regards doses, indications,
hazards and contraindications.
The insert includes but is not limited to the
following information:
-
the
trade and generic names as well as the chemical name.
-
the
primary and side effects are discussed and from these
the indications, hazards and contraindications are
listed. These hazards should be listed in order of frequency
from the most common to the rarest.
-
It will give the strength of the drug
and dosage ranges. If the drug was studied in
children, it should give the doses for children. If the
drug’s not been studied in children, the insert will state
this fact. Not studied in children
under 12 years of age.
-
Onset of action
and duration of action are discussed. The onset of
action is the time in minutes or hours that it takes for the
drug to work. The duration of action is the time in minutes
or hours that the drug’s primary action lasts.
-
the pharmacokinetic action is
discussed [see below]
-
the pharmadynamic action is discussed
[see below]
-
the
tetragenic effects of the drug on the fetus are
discussed. And the drug is rated by categories of its
effects on w unborn babies [category A is safe, Category X
proven risk to fetus] and ability to cross the placental
barrier to harm the baby.
-
the carcinogenic effects of the drug-
its ability to cause cancer is discussed
-
Because most drugs are metabolized in the
liver, a drug’s hepatotoxic effects must be
discussed.
-
While any large molecule especially proteins]
can cause allergic reactions, some drugs are more
likely to cause them than others; this is discussed
-
its drug interactions are discussed
[see below]